Ordering kinetics of block copolymers directed by periodic two-dimensional rectangular fields
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ordering kinetics of directed assembly of cylinder-forming diblock copolymers is investigated by cell dynamics simulation of the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory. The directing field, mimicking chemically or topologically patterned surfaces, is composed of a rectangular array of potential wells which are attractive to the minority blocks. The period of the templating fields is commensurate with the hexagonal lattice of the block copolymer domains. The ordering kinetics is described by the time evolution of the defect concentration, which reveals that the rectangular field of [1 m] for a given density multiplication has the best directing effect, and the reversed case of [m 1] has the worst. Compared with a hexagonal directing field, the rectangular field provides a better directing efficiency for a fixed high density multiplication. The difference of the directing effect can be understood by analyzing the ordering mechanisms in the two types of directing fields. The study reveals that the rectangular pattern is an alternative candidate to direct block copolymer assembly toward large-scale ordered domains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it