MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057522530 · doi:10.3766/jaaa.18.7.5

The Role of Event-Related Brain Potentials in Assessing Central Auditory Processing

2007· article· en· W2057522530 on OpenAlexaff
Claude Alain, Kelly L. Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Music Perception
Canadian institutionsBaycrest Hospital
FundersNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
KeywordsPerceptionAuditory scene analysisPsychologyCognitionAuditory perceptionEvent-related potentialAuditory eventSpeech perceptionAuditory systemComputer scienceCognitive psychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The perception of complex acoustic signals such as speech and music depends on the interaction between peripheral and central auditory processing. As information travels from the cochlea to primary and associative auditory cortices, the incoming sound is subjected to increasingly more detailed and refined analysis. These various levels of analyses are thought to include low-level automatic processes that detect, discriminate and group sounds that are similar in physical attributes such as frequency, intensity, and location as well as higher-level schema-driven processes that reflect listeners' experience and knowledge of the auditory environment. In this review, we describe studies that have used event-related brain potentials in investigating the processing of complex acoustic signals (e.g., speech, music). In particular, we examine the role of hearing loss on the neural representation of sound and how cognitive factors and learning can help compensate for perceptual difficulties. The notion of auditory scene analysis is used as a conceptual framework for interpreting and studying the perception of sound. La percepción de señales acústicas complejas, tales como el lenguaje y la música, dependen de la interacción entre el procesamiento auditivo central y periférico. Conforme la información viaja de la cóclea a la corteza auditiva primaria y de asociación, el sonido entrante se somete un análisis progresivamente más detallado y refinado. Se cree que estos varios niveles de análisis incluyen procesos automáticos de bajo nivel que detectan, discriminan y agrupan los sonidos que son similares en cuanto a los atributos físicos, como la frecuencia, la intensidad y la localización, así como procesos dirigidos por esquemas de más alto nivel, que reflejan la experiencia y el conocimiento del sujeto del ambiente auditivo. En esta revisión, describimos estudios que han utilizado potenciales cerebrales relacionados con el evento, para investigar el procesamiento de señales acústicas complejas (p.e., lenguaje, música). En particular, examinamos el papel de las pérdidas auditivas sobre la representación neural del sonido y de cómo los factores cognitivos y el aprendizaje pueden ayudar a compensar las dificultades perceptivas. La noción de un análisis de la escena auditiva se utiliza como un marco conceptual, para interpretar y estudiar la percepción del sonido.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Academy of AudiologySame topicNeuroscience and Music PerceptionFrench-language works237,207