MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057533280 · doi:10.1021/jp031228m

Low-Temperature Reactions of OH Radicals with Propene and Isoprene in Pulsed Laval Nozzle Expansions

2004· article· en· W2057533280 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tim Spangenberg, Sven P. K. Köhler, Björn Hansmann, Uwe Wachsmuth, Bernd Abel, Mark A. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsopreneChemistryPropeneRadicalReaction rate constantAtmospheric temperature rangePhotochemistryPhotodissociationKineticsPhysical chemistryThermodynamicsOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The kinetics of the reactions of OH radicals with propene and isoprene in N 2 have been studied in the temperature range of 58−300 K in a Laval nozzle expansion. Laser-induced fluorescence of the OH radical that is formed in the photolysis of H 2 O 2 at 193 nm has been detected. The determined rate constants (2 × 10 -11 to 2 × 10 -10 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1 ) for the OH radicals reacting with excess propene and isoprene (2-methyl-1,3-butadiene) have been found to increase when the temperature is decreased. The room temperature rate constants are in agreement with the literature data. Below 120 K, a saturation of the rate constant for the case of propene and a turnover to a formally positive temperature dependence for isoprene have been observed. The observed negative temperature dependence and the course of the temperature dependence at very low temperatures for both reactions are discussed within the framework of the loose transition-state theory and a simple two-transition-state model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207