MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Escaping the matrix: a new algorithm for phylogenetic comparative studies of co‐evolution

2004· article· en· W2057542771 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCladistics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEvolution and Paleontology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCladogramHost (biology)BiologySympatric speciationPhylogenetic treeEvolutionary biologyCladisticsWeightingCoevolutionGenetic algorithmTaxonZoologyEcologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An algorithm for generating host cladograms from parasite-host cladograms derived from parasite phylogenies, Phylogenetic Analysis for Comparing Trees (PACT), is described. PACT satisfies Assumption 0, that all the information in each parasite-host cladogram must be used in a co-evolutionary analysis, and that the host relationships depicted in the final host cladogram must be logically consistent with the phylogenetic relationships depicted in every part of every parasite-host cladogram used to construct the host cladogram. It accounts for cases of speciation by host switching and expansion of host range, and reticulated host relationships, in addition to co-speciation, sympatric speciation, and extinction in all input parasite-host cladograms, and does so without a priori weighting schemes and without a posteriori manipulation of the data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it