MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057545360 · doi:10.1115/1.4007432

Nonlocal Flügge Shell Model for Vibrations of Double-Walled Carbon Nanotubes With Different Boundary Conditions

2012· article· en· W2057545360 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Mechanics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoundary value problemPhysicsEquations of motionClassical mechanicsNormal modevan der Waals forceBeam (structure)MechanicsVibrationQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the vibrational behavior of double-walled carbon nanotubes (DWCNTs) is studied by a nonlocal elastic shell model. The nonlocal continuum model accounting for the small scale effects encompasses its classical continuum counterpart as a particular case. Based upon the constitutive equations of nonlocal elasticity, the displacement field equations coupled by van der Waals forces are derived. The set of governing equations of motion are then numerically solved by a novel method emerged from incorporating the radial point interpolation approximation within the framework of the generalized differential quadrature method. The present analysis provides the possibility of considering different combinations of layerwise boundary conditions. The influences of small scale factor, layerwise boundary conditions and geometrical parameters on the mechanical behavior of DWCNTs are fully investigated. Explicit expressions for the nonlocal frequencies of DWCNTs with all edges simply supported are also analytically obtained by a nonlocal elastic beam model. Some new intertube resonant frequencies and the corresponding noncoaxial vibrational modes are identified due to incorporating circumferential modes into the shell model. A shift in noncoaxial mode numbers, not predictable by the beam model, is also observed when the radius of DWCNTs is varied. The results generated also provide valuable information concerning the applicability of the beam model and new noncoaxial modes affecting the physical properties of nested nanotubes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it