Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Query monitoring refers to the problem of observing and predicting various parameters related to the execution of a query in a database system. In addition to being a useful tool for database users and administrators, it can also serve as an information collection service for resource allocation and adaptive query processing techniques. In this article, we present a query monitoring system from the ground up, describing various new techniques for query monitoring, their implementation inside a real database system, and a novel interface that presents the observed and predicted information in an accessible manner. To enable this system, we introduce several lightweight online techniques for progressively estimating and refining the cardinality of different relational operators using information collected at query execution time. These include binary and multiway joins as well as typical grouping operations and combinations thereof. We describe the various algorithms used to efficiently implement estimators and present the results of an evaluation of a prototype implementation of our framework in an open-source data management system. Our results demonstrate the feasibility and practical utility of the approach presented herein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it