Histological percutaneous diagnosis of stage IV microcystic serous cystadenocarcinoma of the pancreas
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Malignant serous cystic neoplasms (SCN) of the pancreas are exceptionally rare, and only a few cases have been reported. As a result, SCN have been unanimously classified as benign tumours. Contrary to this conviction, in 1989, George et al published the very first case of a patient found to have a malignant pancreatic SCN. Up to the time of the submission of this paper, 27 cases of serous cystoadenocarcinomas have been published. In all the previously published cases of malignant SCN, the correct diagnosis was made postoperatively or at the time of autopsy. The authors present a case of a 68-year-old patient who was incidentally found to have a large liver mass on transthoracic echocardiogram ordered for suspected coronary artery insufficiency. Subsequent investigations revealed an additional large mass in the pancreas and percutaneous biopsies of both lesions revealed histological features consistent with malignant SCN metastasised to the left hepatic lobe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it