MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057556122 · doi:10.1145/1368436.1368449

SMARTA

2006· article· en· W2057556122 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Science CouncilCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsComputer scienceWirelessThroughputChannel (broadcasting)Wireless lanComputer networkPower (physics)ArchitectureNetwork packetWireless LAN controllerWireless networkPoint (geometry)Distributed computingWi-Fi arrayTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optimally choosing operating parameters for access points in an enterprise wireless LAN environment is a difficult and well-studied problem. Unlike past work, the SMARTA self-managing wireless LAN architecture dynamically adjusts both access point channel assignments and power levels in response to measured changes in the wireless environment to optimize arbitrary objective functions, while taking into account the irregular nature of RF propagation, and working with unmodified legacy clients. We evaluate the SMARTA architecture through simulation and show that our solution is not only feasible, but also provides significant improvements over existing approaches. For example, in a realistic scenario, SMARTA can provide 50% more throughput and 40% lower mean per-packet delay than a hand-optimized configuration. Moreover, SMARTA can automatically reconfigure channels and power levels in response to both small and large changes in the RF environment due to client movement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207