MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057557818 · doi:10.1680/wama.2011.164.5.257

Direct integration of Manning-based gradually varied flow equation

2011· article· en· W2057557818 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water Management · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic flow and structures
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlow (mathematics)TracingComputationChannel (broadcasting)MathematicsSimple (philosophy)Open-channel flowApplied mathematicsPotential flowDifferential equationCalculus (dental)Mathematical analysisMathematical optimizationGeometryComputer scienceAlgorithmMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solution of the gradually varied flow equation allows tracing of the flow depth along a channel length. Direct solutions of this differential dynamic equation are available in the technical literature only for the special case of wide rectangular channels and for general rectangular channels based on the simple Chezy formula. No direct solution is available for the case of general rectangular channels based on the complex, but more realistic, Manning formula. This paper presents an approach for establishing the gradually varied flow profile for general rectangular channels through application of the Manning formula. The approach, which yields a very accurate computation of flow profiles, should be a useful tool for direct quantitative analysis and evaluations of general rectangular channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it