MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057570603 · doi:10.1300/j091v10n03_16

Sea Buckthorn:

2001· article· de· W2057570603 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S. Jana

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sustainable Forestry · 2001
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicPhytochemical and Pharmacological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sea buckthorn, Hippophae rhamnoides L., is a member of the family, Elaeagnaceae, is a Eurasian shrub, with wide adaptation and diverse use. The plant bears attractive and edible berries, and is often used as an ornamental. Sea buckthorn is an extremely winter-hardy, drought resistant shrub. It interacts synergistically with other trees and shrubs in mixed stands. It is an excellent source of food and shelter for wildlife. It fixes atmospheric nitrogen, prevents soil erosion and helps to conserve soil moisture. The Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Authority (PFRA), Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada introduced sea buckthorn from only one Siberian population to the Canadian prairies in the early 1930s as a shelterbelt plant. Since all sea buckthorn populations in the 336Canadian prairies are derived from the progeny of a single Siberian sample, the prairie populations of this introduced species are expected to have limited genetic diversity due to the founder effect. One of the objectives of this research was to determine the amount of genetic diversity in local populations of sea buckthorn in comparison with that of native species of the family Elaeagnaceae in the prairies. The second objective was to determine the utility of sea buckthorn as an agroforestry plant in this region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sustainable ForestrySame topicPhytochemical and Pharmacological StudiesFrench-language works237,207