MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Axillary Hyperhidrosis: A 5-Year Review of Treatment Efficacy and Recurrence Rates Using a New Arthroscopic Shaver Technique

2007· review· en· W2057581383 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaCanadian Society of Plastic SurgeonsCegep de Sept IlesDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHyperhidrosisSurgeryPatient satisfactionArthroscopyAxillaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Axillary hyperhidrosis is a chronic condition characterized by excess axillary perspiration. This results in considerable patient morbidity, with no consistently efficacious medical or surgical treatment method described in the literature. METHODS: All cases of axillary hyperhidrosis over a 5-year period were reviewed retrospectively. Data were gathered by a chart review and telephone interview. Inclusion criteria included primary hyperhidrosis, failed conservative therapy, no prior surgical therapy, surgical management using a new arthroscopic shaver technique (R.L.B.-S.), and 6 months of postoperative follow-up. The technique used was consistent between surgeons. Sweating severity was assessed using a subjective numerical rating scale ranging from 1 to 10. Patient demographics, symptom history, results, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Average follow-up for 50 patients meeting the inclusion criteria was 28 months. The subjective severity scale demonstrated severity of 9.8 of 10 preoperatively and 2.3 of 10 postoperatively. Three patients (6 percent) reported mild recurrence of symptoms (4.6 of 10), which was not severe enough to seek further treatment. The average follow-up of those patients was 18.5 months. An overall subjective satisfaction of 96 percent was found, with a treatment success rate of 94 percent. Complications were minimal and self-limiting. The average time away from employment was 3.9 days and the average surgical operating room time was 46 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' new arthroscopic shaver technique is efficacious, with no significant morbidity, a 96 percent satisfaction rate, a subjectively measured 75 percent reduction of sweat, and a recurrence rate of only 6 percent. For cases of primary hyperhidrosis affecting the axilla not amenable to conservative treatment, the authors recommend an arthroscopic shaver technique as the first-line treatment of choice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it