MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Axillary Hyperhidrosis: A 5-Year Review of Treatment Efficacy and Recurrence Rates Using a New Arthroscopic Shaver Technique

2007· review· en· W2057581383 on OpenAlexaff
Jugpal S. Arneja, Thomas Hayakawa, Gautam Bir Singh, Kenneth A. Murray, Robert B. Turner, Lonny L. Ross, Richard Bendor-Samuel

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaCanadian Society of Plastic SurgeonsCegep de Sept IlesDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHyperhidrosisSurgeryPatient satisfactionArthroscopyAxillaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Axillary hyperhidrosis is a chronic condition characterized by excess axillary perspiration. This results in considerable patient morbidity, with no consistently efficacious medical or surgical treatment method described in the literature. METHODS: All cases of axillary hyperhidrosis over a 5-year period were reviewed retrospectively. Data were gathered by a chart review and telephone interview. Inclusion criteria included primary hyperhidrosis, failed conservative therapy, no prior surgical therapy, surgical management using a new arthroscopic shaver technique (R.L.B.-S.), and 6 months of postoperative follow-up. The technique used was consistent between surgeons. Sweating severity was assessed using a subjective numerical rating scale ranging from 1 to 10. Patient demographics, symptom history, results, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Average follow-up for 50 patients meeting the inclusion criteria was 28 months. The subjective severity scale demonstrated severity of 9.8 of 10 preoperatively and 2.3 of 10 postoperatively. Three patients (6 percent) reported mild recurrence of symptoms (4.6 of 10), which was not severe enough to seek further treatment. The average follow-up of those patients was 18.5 months. An overall subjective satisfaction of 96 percent was found, with a treatment success rate of 94 percent. Complications were minimal and self-limiting. The average time away from employment was 3.9 days and the average surgical operating room time was 46 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' new arthroscopic shaver technique is efficacious, with no significant morbidity, a 96 percent satisfaction rate, a subjectively measured 75 percent reduction of sweat, and a recurrence rate of only 6 percent. For cases of primary hyperhidrosis affecting the axilla not amenable to conservative treatment, the authors recommend an arthroscopic shaver technique as the first-line treatment of choice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgerySame topicSympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207