MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057605931 · doi:10.1063/1.2903560

Ruthenium nano-oxide layer in CoFe-Ru-CoFe trilayer system: An x-ray reflectivity study

2008· article· en· W2057605931 on OpenAlexaff
Saeid Asgharizadeh, Mark Sutton, Z. Altounian, M. Mao, C. L. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic properties of thin films
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnnealing (glass)Materials scienceRutheniumRuthenium oxideMagnetoresistanceOxideThermal stabilityElectrical resistivity and conductivitySputteringAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Condensed matter physicsNano-Thin filmComposite materialMetallurgyNanotechnologyChemical engineeringMagnetic fieldChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A grazing incidence x-ray reflectivity technique is used to determine the electron density profile as a function of depth in CoFe-Ru-CoFe and CoFe-Ru nano-oxide layer (NOL)–CoFe trilayers. Four trilayers with ruthenium thicknesses of 8, 8.5, and 9Å and one with Ru 8.5Å NOL, prepared by a dc planetary sputtering system, were investigated. For all samples, the electron density profile (EDP) shows a central peak that is related to the Ru layer. Natural oxidation in all of the samples introduces a graded EDP of the top CoFe layers, which decreases gradually to zero. The large surface resistivity of Ru 8.5Å NOL as compared to Ru 8.5Å is related to the remarkable difference between their EDPs. EDP changes have also been investigated in Ru NOL trilayers after annealing at 280°C. The Ru phase in the EDP was observed to confirm the thermal stability of the spacer layer after annealing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicMagnetic properties of thin filmsFrench-language works237,207