MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057646888 · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01416-6

Neurocognitive correlates of the COMT Val158Met polymorphism in chronic schizophrenia

2002· article· en· W2057646888 on OpenAlexaff
Robert M. Bilder, Jan Volavka, Pál Czobor, Anil K. Malhotra, Xingqun Ni, Robert Goldman, Matthew J. Hoptman, Brian Sheitman, Jean-Pierre Lindenmayer, Leslie Citrome, Joseph P. McEvoy, Michal Kunz, Miranda Chakos, Thomas B. Cooper, Jeffrey A. Lieberman

Bibliographic record

VenueBiological Psychiatry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Mental Health
KeywordsNeurocognitivePsychologyWisconsin Card Sorting TestCatechol-O-methyl transferaseCognitionPolymorphism (computer science)Card sortingAlleleSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)NeuropsychologyPsychiatryGeneticsBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations325
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueBiological PsychiatrySame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207