MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

THE INFLUENCE OF ATTACHMENT METHOD AND CLOTHING ON SKIN TEMPERATURE SENSOR ACCURACY

2001· article· en· W2057647913 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen S. Cheung, Dana Sweeney

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfrared Thermography in Medicine
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermocoupleSkin temperatureClothingMaterials scienceTemperature measurementBiomedical engineeringComposite materialMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Skin temperature (Tsk) is commonly measured with contact sensors taped to the skin. Due to it being exposed to both the skin and the environment, Tsk is a reflection of both actual skin temperature and also the surrounding environment. However, no standardization of attachment methods exists, with the majority of protocols simply stating that skin sensors were taped to the skin. Biophysically, taping the sensor should act similarly to an additional layer of clothing, providing a barrier to heat exchange. Therefore, tapes with different thermal characteristics may influence the accuracy of Tsk measurement. This study investigated the separate and combined effects of Tsk attachment methods and clothing insulation on Tsk accuracy. On the arm of a Thermal Instrumented Manikin (TIM), thermocouples (YSI 499B) were attached using either waterproof tape (Elastoplast), surgical tape (Transpore), or a rubber ring that secured the thermocouples without covering it. Measurements of Tsk were taken with the manikin temperature (TTIM) set to 32–40°C in 2°C increments. Three levels of clothing insulation were tested: 1) nude, 2) cotton flannel shirt (1.0 clo), and a marine immersion survival suit (2.2 clo). Ambient temperature was 21°C for all trials. All conditions produced Tsk readings that were significantly lower than the actual manikin temperature. In the nude trial, as TTIM increased from 32–40°C, Tsk error increased from −1.4 to −1.7°C for Ring. This was significantly less than the errors for Surgical (−1.5 to −2.1°C) and Waterproof (−1.4 to 2.1°C). With the cotton clothing, Tsk measured −1.0 to −1.4°C, −1.2 to −1.6°C, and −1.3 to −2.0°C for Ring, Surgical, and Waterproof attachment, respectively. With the survival suit, Tsk measured −0.9 to −1.3°C, −1.0 to −1.4°C, and −1.1 to −1.7°C for Ring, Surgical, and Waterproof attachment, respectively. The conclusions from this study are as follows: Tsk measured using contact sensors underestimated the actual skin surface temperature in a thermoneutral environment, with the magnitude of the error increasing with an increase in the thermal gradient between the skin and the environment. An increase in clothing insulation results in a decrease in Tsk error, likely due to increased heat retention around the sensor and a subsequent decrease in the thermal gradient. Tsk is influenced by the attachment method, with the least error when attached by a ring. It is recommended that consideration be given to standardizing attachment methods for contact skin sensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.893

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicInfrared Thermography in MedicineFrench-language works237,207