MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057653779 · doi:10.1139/o08-125

In situ calcium mapping in the mouse retina via time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry: modulation of retinal angiogenesis by calcium ion in development and oxygen-induced retinopathy

2008· article· en· W2057653779 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jeong Hun Kim, Jin Hyoung Kim, Young Suk Yu, Dong Hun Kim, Tae Geol Lee, Dae Won Moon, Kyu‐Won Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of HealthKorea Science and Engineering Foundation
KeywordsRetinaAngiogenesisCalciumRetinalChemistryNeovascularizationCell biologyBiologyBiochemistryCancer researchNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pathological angiogenesis in the eye is the most common cause of blindness in all age groups. In physiological and pathological cellular processes including angiogenesis, ion homeostasis is greatly affected. This study is to investigate the role of calcium ion in physiological and pathological angiogenesis in the retina, which is based on the results of ion mapping by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS). We provided that calcium distribution is the most accordant to change with physiological vessel formation of development in the retina and pathological angiogenesis of oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR), which is supported by ion mapping in retinal tissue using TOF-SIMS. In addition to anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic activity of the calcium inhibitor on endothelial cells, retinal neovascularization of OIR was effectively inhibited by the calcium inhibitor. Calcium ion could play a crucial role in physiological and pathological angiogenesis in the retina. Moreover, TOF-SIMS could be a good method to simultaneously evaluate the changes of variable ions of the retina in biological processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207