Practical Ring-Opening Strategy for the Sequence Determination of Cyclic Peptides from One-Bead-One-Compound Libraries
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of cyclic peptides in one-bead-one-compound libraries is limited by difficulties in sequencing hit compounds. Lacking a free N-terminal amine, such peptides cannot be sequenced by the Edman degradation approach, and complex fragmentation patterns are obtained by tandem mass spectrometry. To overcome this problem, we designed an alternative approach introducing a methionine residue within the macrocycle and as a linker to allow simultaneous ring-opening and release from the resin upon treatment with cyanogen bromide. The methionine linker was inverted relative to the peptide chain to allow the synthesis of cyclic peptides anchored by a lysine side chain and to avoid the presence of two C-terminal homoserine lactones on the released linear peptides. After MALDI-TOF MS/MS analysis, the peptides released from a single bead were sequenced manually and with a de novo sequencing software. The strategy described herein is compatible with commonly used amino acids and allows sequencing of cyclic peptides in one-bead-one-compound libraries, thus reducing the need for encoding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it