MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057696597 · doi:10.1115/sbc2008-192958

Fatigue Loading Causes Earlier Modulus Reduction Than Creep Loading in Healing Rabbit Medial Collateral Ligaments

2008· article· en· W2057696597 on OpenAlexaff
Soraya J. Bailey, Gail M. Thornton

Bibliographic record

VenueASME 2008 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Parts A and B · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceModulusCreepUltimate tensile strengthComposite materialStrain (injury)Elastic modulusStress (linguistics)Reduction (mathematics)Biomedical engineeringAnatomyMedicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During normal daily activities, ligaments experience a range of stresses. These stresses can be repetitive, sustained or a complex combination of the two [1]. The stress-strain curve of ligaments is comprised of two parts: the toe region with increasing modulus, and the linear region which has constant modulus. Normal physiologic loading occurs between 5% and 10% of the ultimate tensile strength (UTS), and the transition from the toe region to the linear region occurs at approximately 15% of UTS [2]. Ligaments healing from an injury have decreased failure properties compared to normal ligaments [3], which may correspondingly affect the ability of healing ligaments to function under physiologic loads. Modulus reduction was found to be a suitable marker of damage in normal ligaments [4]. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of long-term fatigue and creep loading on modulus changes in healing medial collateral ligaments (MCLs).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASME 2008 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Parts A and BSame topicOrthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207