MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057709679 · doi:10.1117/12.2081494

Lateral resolution enhancement via imbricated spectral domain optical coherence tomography in a maximum-a-posterior reconstruction framework

2015· article· en· W2057709679 on OpenAlexaff
Ameneh Boroomand, Mohammad Javad Shafiee, Alexander Wong, Kostadinka Bizheva

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Coherence Tomography Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical coherence tomographyOpticsImage resolutionComputer scienceIterative reconstructionMedical imagingMaterials scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The lateral resolution of a Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) image is limited by the focusing properties of the OCT imaging probe optics, the wavelength range which SD-OCT system operates at, spherical and chromatic aberrations induced by the imaging optics, the optical properties of the imaged object, and in the special case of in-vivo retinal imaging by the optics of the eye. This limitation often results in challenges with resolving fine details and structures of the imaged sample outside of the Depth-Of-Focus (DOF) range. We propose a novel technique for generating Laterally Resolved OCT (LR-OCT) images using OCT measurements acquired with intentional imbrications. The proposed, novel method is based on a Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) reconstruction framework which takes advantage of a Stochastic Fully Connected Conditional Random Field (SFCRF) model to compensate for the artifacts and noise when reconstructing a LR-OCT image from imbricated OCT measurement. The proposed lateral resolution enhancement method was tested on synthetic OCT measurement as well as on a human cornea SDOCT image to evaluate the usefulness of the proposed approach in lateral resolution enhancement. Experimental results show that applying this method to OCT images, noticeably improves the sharpness of morphological features in the OCT image and in lateral direction, thus demonstrating better delineation of fine dot shape details in the synthetic OCT test, as well as better delineation of the keratocyte cells in the human corneal OCT test image.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicOptical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207