Authenticités québécoises. Le Québec et la fragmentation contemporaine de l’identité
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Une partie des nationalistes québécois continuent de penser l’identité québécoise dans les termes d’une éthique d’authenticité qui définit de façon substantive ce qu’est la québécitude. En réaction contre cet incorporation de l’identité québécoise dans des catégories hermétiques, un courant antinationaliste/cosmopolitique s’est développé au Québec. Or, une réflexion sur la fragmentation de l’identité moderne et sur le sentiment de dépaysement qui habite le sujet contemporain empêche toute tentative de fixation identitaire (qu’elle soit nationaliste ou cosmopolitique). C’est pourquoi l’identité québécoise doit être pensée dans les termes d’une éthique de créativité et d’une authenticité hybride qui permet à la fois l’enracinement et l’arrachement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".