The Teton – Wind River domain: a 2.68–2.67 Ga active margin in the western Wyoming Province
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Archean rocks in western Wyoming, including the Teton Range, the northern Wind River Range, and the western Owl Creek Mountains, preserve a record of a 2.68–2.67 Ga orogenic belt that has many of the hallmarks of modern plate tectonics. A 2683 Ma tholeiitic dike swarm is undeformed and unmetamorphosed in the western Owl Creek Mountains. In the Wind River Range, these dikes have been deformed and metamorphosed during thrusting along the west- to southwest-directed Mount Helen structural belt, which was active at the time that the 2.67 Ga Bridger batholith was emplaced. In the northern Teton Range, the Moose Basin gneiss, which contains relict granulite-facies assemblages, appears to have been thrust upon the amphibolite-grade layered gneiss. The syntectonic Webb Canyon orthogneiss was intruded into the thrust at or before 2673 Ma. We interpret these relations, along with isotopic data indicating that the layered gneiss in the Teton Range consists of juvenile components, to indicate that the western Wyoming Province was the site of active margin tectonics at 2.68–2.67 Ga. This involved a magmatic arc in the present Wind River Range and back-arc spreading in the Owl Creek Mountains. The immature, juvenile layered gneiss in the Teton Range probably represents an accretionary prism or fore-arc basin onto which high-pressure rocks containing a mature sedimentary sequence were thrust at 2.67 Ga. Although it may be questioned as to when modern-style plate tectonics began in other cratons, it was certainly operating in the Wyoming Province by 2.67 Ga.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".