MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057760750 · doi:10.1159/000050070

Characterization of DNA Binding Protein of Porcine Adenovirus Type 3

2001· article· en· W2057760750 on OpenAlexafffund
Yan Zhou, Caron Pyne, Suresh K. Tikoo

Bibliographic record

VenueIntervirology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsMolecular biologyFusion proteinProtein A/GBiologyWestern blotProtein GAntiserumImmunoprecipitationAntibodyVirologyRecombinant DNABiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To identify and characterize the protein encoded by the E2A region of porcine adenovirus (PAV)-3, DNA sequence coding for a portion (amino acids 102-457) of the DNA binding protein (DBP) open reaching frame was cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli as a fusion protein with glutathione S-transferase protein of Schistosoma japonica. The affinity-purified fusion protein was used to immunize rabbits. Immunoprecipitation/Western blot analysis demonstrated that the antisera specifically recognized a protein of 50 kD in PAV-3-infected cells. Immunoperoxidase staining detected the DBP protein predominantly in the nucleus of the cells. Western blot analysis demonstrated that DBP was detected as early as 6 h after infection and remained detectable throughout the infection. Based on these results, a novel assay for quantitation of PAV-3 was established. The assay is less time consuming and can be performed in different porcine cells. In addition, virus titers determined by this assay are comparable to the standard plaque assay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntervirologySame topicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsFrench-language works237,207