Correlation and Convolution Analysis of Peptide Mass Spectra
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As proteomics continues to establish itself as an effective postgenomic research tool, there is an increasingly urgent need for efficient, automated analysis techniques capable of effectively dealing with the vast amounts of data generated via mass spectrometry. Wholesale analysis packages, often used to deal with these enormous amounts of data, may benefit from supplementary, targeted analyses as current research begins to emphasize posttranscriptional/translational protein modifications, protein truncations, and poorly characterized mutations. We demonstrate the application of a new analysis technique based on mathematical correlation that is computationally efficient and robust against different instruments, noise levels, and experimental conditions. We have previously shown that this technique is able to extract pertinent mass shift signals from MS data, corresponding to the neutral loss of a modification from a peptide, e.g., a loss of 79.97 Th from phosphorylated tyrosine. Here we show that an extension of this method is applicable to MS and MS/MS data in general, allowing visualization of ions that produce a particular mass shift signal, be it from differential stable isotope labeling, overlap of fragment ions in a series, or ions that produce a neutral loss. The application of this method allows the researcher to discover individual features, such as the presence of specific modified or isotopically labeled peptides, to eliminate overlapping fragment ion series, and to localize specific sites of modification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".