MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Promoting psychiatric student nurse well‐being

2004· review· en· W2057767166 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick J. Morrissette

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing education and management
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursingPsychologyMEDLINEMedicinePsychiatryPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although students are often attracted to the profession of psychiatric nursing, they are rarely prepared for the realities associated with clinical seminars and direct clinical practice. Subsequently, student nurses commonly report the resurgence of painful life events or symptoms of psychological injury when learning about or witnessing patient behaviour. This paper underlines the importance of student-faculty collaboration when promoting and monitoring student nurse well-being. Along with providing descriptions and case vignettes depicting two specific forms of psychological injury, this paper suggests practical steps that are designed to promote student nurse well-being.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Psychiatric and Mental Health NursingSame topicNursing education and managementFrench-language works237,207