Territorial Spoils, Transnational Black Resistance, and Canada’s Evolving Autonomy during the First World War
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article expose la montée et la chute des campagnes canadiennes visant à annexer les colonies britanniques des Indes occidentales au cours de la Première Guerre mondiale afin de souligner l’importance des Antilles britanniques et la montée de la résistance transnationale des Noirs en ce qui a trait à l’évolution de l’autonomie du Canada au sein de l’Empire britannique. L’auteure suggère que la lutte pour l’autonomie canadienne pendant la guerre était un projet à motivation raciale dont l’issue dépendait des relations de plus en plus tendues entre les Blancs canadiens et les Antillais noirs. En évoquant les Antilles britanniques et les luttes en faveur de la justice raciale de ces îles dans le discours de guerre sur l’autonomie canadienne, l’article replace un élément important de la formation sociale du temps de la guerre en dialogue avec un sujet qui se limite normalement à l’histoire diplomatique et constitutionnelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".