MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057832679 · doi:10.1109/i2mtc.2012.6229585

Contourlet based distance measurement to improve fingerprint identification accuracy

2012· article· en· W2057832679 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContourletArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Kullback–Leibler divergenceFingerprint (computing)Computer scienceGaussianClassifier (UML)Distance measuresMeasure (data warehouse)Entropy (arrow of time)MathematicsComputer visionWavelet transformData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, Kullback-Leibler Distance (KLD) is employed to measure the dissimilarity between marginal statistical features of contourlet transform to fingerprint identification. Conourlet transform is a non separable two dimensional transform which can well capture the geometry of edges in the images which convey important information for the human visual system (HVS). Here, marginal statistics of each transform subband are modeled by a Generalized Gaussian Density (GGD) model and the GGD parameters-α and β- are granted as the extracted features from the corresponding subbands and the fingerprint recognition is done based on k-NN classifier employing Kullback-Leibler Distance (KLD) measure. The fingerprint recognition results confirm the high efficiency of the proposed system comparing with the state of the art methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiometric Identification and SecurityFrench-language works237,207