MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057848741 · doi:10.1109/plasma.2006.1707083

Optimization of an atmospheric pressure direct-contact DBD for the treatment of aqueous pharmaceutical solutions

2006· article· en· W2057848741 on OpenAlexaff
J. Jureidini, Sylvain Coulombe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlasma Applications and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOxidizing agentDielectric barrier dischargeOzoneAtmospheric pressureAqueous solutionHydrogen peroxideChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Volumetric flow ratePlasma cleaningAtmospheric-pressure plasmaElectrodeMaterials sciencePlasmaChemical engineeringChromatographyOrganic chemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. Ozone has been widely used in water treatment due to its extreme reactivity and its strong oxidizing properties. Technologies using electrical discharges generated directly over or in the fluid to be treated are being studied because they may prove to be cheap and effective. In this research project, a hybrid gas-liquid atmospheric pressure dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) reactor has been designed and used to treat pharmaceutical solutions. The liquid is sandwiched inside a parallel plate DBD and thus, directly exposed to the plasma-forming region. Oxygen or air flows above the liquid to be treated. The application of 10 kV on the high voltage electrode, at an average frequency of 17.5 kHz, induces plasma streamers in the gas phase. The power dissipated in the DBD (50 W on average) is monitored from the measure of the Lissajou figure. It is believed that the transport of ozone generated in the gaseous gap into the liquid solution is enhanced by the agitation of the free surface, itself induced by the streamers. The formation of additional oxidizers in the liquid solution such as hydroxyl radicals and hydrogen peroxide is also suspected. The effects of treatment time (1-15 minutes), discharge gap (3-4 mm), gas flow rate (20-400 cc/min), composition of the gas (pure oxygen or air) is being investigated to determine the optimum parameters for the treatment of aqueous pharmaceutical solutions. The optimization is being performed by monitoring the absorbance at 600 nm of solutions in which potassium indigo trisulfonate is diluted. This molecule dyes water in blue due to its C=C bond which can be broken by oxidation, resulting in the decrease in absorbance of the solution at 600 nm. The DBD reactor is more efficient with oxygen than with air; the difference in color removal is 30% when comparing the results obtained with an oxygen flow of 160 cc/min to an air flow of 160 cc/min after a treatment time of 7 minutes and with a discharge gap of 3.9 mm. It is also found that the extent of color removal increases with treatment time; color removal is 93% after 7 minutes compared to 47% after 3 minutes with an oxygen flow of 25 cc/min and a discharge gap of 3.9 mm. The optimum values for the operating parameters will be used to degrade sulfamethoxazole, an antibiotic, in water. The results will be compared to those of collaborators obtained using conventional degradation procedures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlasma Applications and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207