MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057850056 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v7n1p88

Maximum Principle for Totally Umbilical Null Hypersurfaces and Time-dependent Null Horizons

2015· article· en· W2057850056 on OpenAlexaffvenue
K. L. Duggal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNull (SQL)MathematicsGeodesicGeneral relativityMathematical analysisSpacetimeCurvaturePure mathematicsGeodesics in general relativityMathematical physicsGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we modify the maximum principal of (Galloway, 2000) for totally geodesic null hypersurfaces by proving a geometric maximum principle which obeys mean curvature inequalities of a family of totally umbilical null hypersurfaces of a spacetime manifold (Theorem~6). As a physical interpretation we show that, in particular, for a prescribed class of spacetimes the geometric inequality of the Theorem~6 for totally umbilical null hypersurfaces is valid as well as it establishes a link with Galloway's vanishing mean curvature totally geodesic null hypersurfaces that arise most naturally in general relativity, such as black hole event horizons (Theorem 7).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.202
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematics ResearchSame topicGeometric Analysis and Curvature FlowsFrench-language works237,207