Family Beginnings: A Comparison of Spouses’ Recollections of Courtship
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Family stories are replete with tales about why spouses married and what occurred. Spouses construct their courtship stories in such a way as to capture the unique quality of their relationship as well as chronicle family beginnings. The purpose of this study is to describe and compare spouses’ recollections concerning the events preceding their marriages and the reasons surrounding their decision to marry. One hundred twenty-four spouses were interviewed. Husbands reported longer courtships and typically made a formal marriage proposal. Wives offered more reasons for marriage in their accounts. Dyadic reasons were reported most often by both spouses for their decisions to marry. The conveyance of courtship stories contributes insight into how spouses wish to recount their relationship history to future generations. Furthermore, the comparison of spousal perspectives leads to greater profundity regarding the construction of a shared account for the decision to marry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it