ENDOMEMBRANE ULTRASTRUCTURE AND POSSIBLE CHLOROPLAST PROTEIN IMPORT PATHWAY IN <i>HETEROSIGMA AKASHIWO</i> (RAPHIDOPHYCEAE)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chloroplasts in heterokont algae probably originated from a red algal endosymbiont which was engulfed and retained by a eukaryotic host, and are surrounded by four envelope membranes. The outermost of these membranes is called chloroplast ER (CER) and usually connects with the nuclear envelope. This information, however, is based mainly on studies on single‐plastid heterokont algae. In multi‐plastid heterokont algae, it is still unclear whether CER is continuous with the nuclear envelope. Since nuclear‐encoded chloroplast proteins are synthesized by ribosomes on the ER membrane, clarifying the ER‐CER structure in the heterokont algae is important in order to know the targeting pathway of those proteins. We did a detailed ultrastructural observation of endomembrane systems in a multi‐plastid heterokont alga: Heterosigma akashiwo, and confirmed that the CER membrane was continuous with the ER membrane. However, unlike the CER membranes in other heterokont algae, it seemed to have very few ribosome attached. We also performed experiments for protein targeting into canine microsomes using a precursor for a nuclear‐encoded chloroplast protein, a fucoxanthin‐chlorophyll protein (FCP), of H. akashiwo, to see if the protein is targeted to the ER. It demonstrated that the precursor has a functional signal sequence for ER targeting, and is co‐translationally translocated into the microsomes. Based on these data, we propose a hypothesis that, in H. akashiwo, nuclear‐encoded chloroplast protein precursors that have been co‐translationally inserted into the ER lumen are sorted in the ER and transported to the chloroplasts through the ER.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".