MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2057895274 · doi:10.12927/hcq.2013.22004

Moving Toward an Organized Approach to Patient Education in Canadian Hospitals

2010· article· en· W2057895274 on OpenAlexaffabout
Farrah Schwartz, Tracy Hutchings, Audrey Jusko Friedman, Naa Kwarley Quartey, Sara Urowitz, David Wiljer, Rachel Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Quarterly · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreHamilton Health SciencesSchwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth carePatient educationMedicineNursingBest practiceMedical educationPsychologyPublic relationsManagementPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hospital care is part of a complex healthcare system that can be difficult for individuals to navigate (Institute of Medicine 2004). There is significant pressure on patients to make sense of information due to the increasing burden of chronic disease, an increasing need for individuals to manage their own care and an abundance of consumer health information from various sources (Institute of Medicine 2004). To meet these demands, patients require tailored health information to help them make informed decisions, develop basic self-care skills, recognize problems and know what to do (London 2009). Patient education plays a significant role in helping people to succeed in these tasks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0320.008
Scholarly communication0.0110.004
Open science0.0060.015
Research integrity0.0070.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare Quarterly→Same topicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes→French-language works237,207→