MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Computational Study of the Kinetics and Mechanism of the Gas Phase Pyrolysis of Allyl Methyl Amine

2011· article· en· W2057909761 on OpenAlex
Mohammad Izadyar, Effat Esmaili, Mohammad Harati

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Reaction Kinetics and Mechanism · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryNatural bond orbitalDensity functional theoryComputational chemistryPropeneAmine gas treatingReaction mechanismTransition stateGas phaseIminePyrolysisPhysical chemistryMoleculeOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A density functional theory (DFT) study has been carried out at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level on the gas-phase retro-ene reaction of allyl methyl amine (AMN). The results were compared with single point calculations at a high level of the theory, using the G3MP2 method. Two mechanisms for this kind of reaction are possible, one involves a six-membered cyclic transition state (TS) and the other is a multistep, free radical mechanism. Both DFT and high level calculations show that propene and imine formation are in accordance with a concerted cyclic mechanism. Natural bond orbital analysis (NBO) and atoms-in-molecule (AIM) procedures show that the reaction achieves a synchronicity value of 90%. The calculated kinetic parameters for AMN pyrolysis agree with the available experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.372

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it