Multiple SOFMs Working Cooperatively In a Vote-based Ranking System For Network Intrusion Detection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protection from hackers on networks is currently of great importance. Recent examples of victims include the recent repeated hacking of Sony PS3, which involved 24.6 million customer accounts being vulnerable, and the hacking of websites both includ-ing US and Canadian government sites. Thus there is a drear need for effective Intrusion Detection and Prevention systems. Anomaly intrusion detection is a popular method of detecting Intrusions on Computer Networks. In 2011, Wilson and Obimbo proved that the use of Self-Organized Feature Maps (SOFM) could be used to increase the performance on KDD-99 dataset. This paper introduces a vote-based ranking system for intrusion detection based on SOFM. The experimental results are promising and are an improvement in both Wilson and Obimbo's system and the Winning system of the KDD IDS Competition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it