MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057929833 · doi:10.3406/ecofi.2006.4159

ISR : des fonds français « canada dry »

2006· article· en· W2057929833 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michel Vigier

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d économie financière · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalance (ability)PublicationInvestment (military)Asset (computer security)EconomicsCapital (architecture)BusinessMarket economyEconomyPolitical scienceLawGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

French SRI : the absence of real socially responsible policy Coming from Anglo-Saxon countries where this principle of management is used by certain investors or savers for 80 years, the « ethical » investment and corresponding concerns arrived in France in 2001 with the NRE Law and the Law on company savings plan. However, the French SRI balance sheet remains disappointing : - the big firms of the French CAC 40 publish a « sustainable development » annex, but the quality of these appendix are variable and the most part of the small and medium enterprises content themselves with doing the minimum ; -managed capital by investment « ethical » funds remains marginal to the French market of asset management. This article deals with this failure and its reasons which are numerous, but turn, in fact, around the absence of real mobilization of the main actors. JEL classification : G11, M14, Q01

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2930.047

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d économie financièreSame topicHousing, Finance, and NeoliberalismFrench-language works237,207