MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057930496 · doi:10.4043/11919-ms

Global Analysis of Wellhead Protection Glory Holes For Terra Nova

2000· article· en· W2057930496 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sam Allen

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWellheadIcebergSubseaSubmarine pipelineGeologyOceanographySea icePetroleum engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Terra Nova wellheads are sited in depressions ("Glory Holes") made in the seabed to protect the wellhead equipment from iceberg impact. This paper describes the construction of the Terra Nova Glory Holes including the choice of protection system, the choice of excavation method, onshore preparation and offshore operations. It concludes with a discussion on the use of the chosen excavation technology for other applications in the offshore oil and gas industry. Introduction The Terra Nova Oil Field Development is located offshore Newfoundland, Canada, some 350 km ESE of the provincial capital, St. John's. The field is located in an area, which is subject to iceberg migration. Bottom scouring icebergs are known to have traversed the region in the past, as evidenced by scour marks of up to 1.5 metres deep on the seafloor. The water depth at the Terra Nova field is 95 metres and a bottom-scouring iceberg has a mass in the order of several million tonnes. If such an iceberg were to collide with subsea wellhead equipment, the consequences are potentially severe. Terra Nova has a comprehensive ice management strategy based on detection, monitoring and deflection, to prevent iceberg encroachment into the vicinity of the field. However, the application of such an ice management strategy does not guarantee that the encroachment of icebergs into the area will be completely avoided. It is thus, necessary, to protect the subsea wellhead equipment from bottom scouring icebergs. Detailed studies conducted by Terra Nova Alliance member Coflexip Stena Offshore concluded that the optimum way of protecting the subsea wells from bottom scouring icebergs is to site the wellhead equipment in excavated depressions (termed "Glory Holes") in the seabed (Fig.1). The Terra Nova Glory Holes were constructed in the summer of 1999 using trailer suction dredging technology. A Glory Hole was constructed at each drill centre; five in all, each being 10 metres in depth. The largest Glory Hole has a base area of 65 metres by 25 metres, and is roughly equivalent in size to a tennis stadium. Wellhead Protection Method Selection Whilst Terra Nova is using open Glory Holes as a means to provide protection to the subsea equipment, a number of wellhead protection methods were considered Cased Glory Hole: This method involves placing the wellhead and Christmas tree in a steel or concrete silo typically 8 metres in diameter. Installation would normally be carried out from a drilling rig. The silo is installed prior to the commencement of drilling operations. The silo has a weak-point at a pre-determined elevation below sea level. In the case of iceberg impact, the silo is sheared at the weak point and the upper part of the silo is sacrificed, leaving the lower part of the silo, the wellhead and the Christmas tree in tact. The Cased Glory Hole is particularly suited to single wellheads. Caisson Completion Method: This method involves a seabed level Xmas tree with the wellhead situated below the iceberg scour line. Installation is carried out from the drilling rig.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOffshore Technology ConferenceSame topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207