High Frequency Faradaic Rectification Voltammetry at Microelectrodes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An experimental setup for carrying out faradaic rectification measurements at micrometer-sized electrodes under potential control is described. A new method of data analysis is proposed that allows the determination of the standard rate constant and the electron-transfer coefficient of a fast charge transfer process without knowing the impedance of the microelectrode. This method is based on the frequency dependence of the shape of the faradaic rectification voltammograms (i.e., the average width of the peaks and the ratio of the peak heights) rather than on the magnitude of the faradaic rectification signal. The method was tested in the determination of heterogeneous electron transfer kinetics of Fe(CN)6(3-/4-) and Ru(NH3)6(2+/3+) in aqueous solutions on a platinum microelectrode (12.5 microm in radius) and ferrocene/ferrocinum redox couple in a dimethylformamide solution on a gold microelectrode (12.5 microm in radius).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".