MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optical behaviour of thick gold and silver films with periodic circular nanohole arrays

2012· article· en· W2057982942 on OpenAlexafffund
Ahmadreza Hajiaboli, Mojtaba Kahrizi, Vo‐Van Truong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics D Applied Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceScatteringExtraordinary optical transmissionTransmittanceOpticsSurface plasmon polaritonPlasmonSurface plasmonTransmission (telecommunications)Light scatteringOptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract To better understand the enhanced optical transmission observed with an array of nanoholes on optically thick metallic films, an extensive numerical calculation is presented in this paper to relate the scattering modes observed to transmittance spectral behaviour. Surface plasmon polariton Bloch waves, Wood's anomalies and localized surface plasmon resonances at the rim of the nanoholes are investigated based on scattering modes that form the features of the transmission spectrum. The finite difference time-domain method is applied to calculate the transmission intensity from films of gold and silver subjected to variations in geometrical parameters such as film thickness, spatial period of the structures and hole diameter. Analysis of transmission spectra showed that the cut-off frequency of the array of subwavelength holes is mostly defined by the thickness of the film and the diameter of the holes rather than the periodicity of the structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.728

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics D Applied PhysicsSame topicPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon ResearchFrench-language works237,207