Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis une quinzaine d’années, le Mali et plus particulièrement Bamako, sa capitale, qui abrite depuis 1994 un festival international de photographie, ont été le « laboratoire » de plusieurs projets de valorisation du patrimoine photographique africain. Cet article aborde les projets plus récents, initiés, totalement ou en partie, par des acteurs maliens, tout en rappelant que ces projets s’inscrivent dans la continuité d’un mouvement de reconnaissance, soutenu au départ par le marché de l’art occidental, des œuvres de Seydou Keita et Malick Sidibé, portraitistes bamakois des années 1950-1970. Cet article tente donc de retracer, dans ses grandes lignes, ce mouvement de reconnaissance qui, partant d’initiatives exogènes prises dans les années 1990, a progressivement conduit les autorités politiques et culturelles du Mali à considérer la valeur patrimoniale des archives photographiques conservées au pays, à la faveur du renouveau démocratique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".