MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2058043303 · doi:10.1017/s000842390523010x

La compétence civique. Comment les citoyens informés contribuent au bon fonctionnement de la démocratie.

2005· article· fr· W2058043303 on OpenAlexaffabout
Papa Samba Ndiaye

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Political Science · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La compétence civique. Comment les citoyens informés contribuent au bon fonctionnement de la démocratie., Henry Milner., Laval : Les Presses de l'Université Laval, 2004, 388 p. Pourquoi assiste-t-on à une crise de la participation ? Pourquoi le taux d'abstention aux élections augmente-t-il à chaque échéance électorale dans les démocraties contemporaines? Les explications avancées varient, mais le livre d'Henry Milner en suggère une nouvelle, à savoir le faible degré de connaissance civique des citoyens. L'auteur compare quinze pays industrialisés allant de l'Amérique du Nord à l'Europe occidentale en passant par l'Australie et la Nouvelle Zélande.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.011
Scholarly communication0.0120.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Political Science→Same topicSocial Sciences and Governance→French-language works237,207→