MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058045153 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2003.820166

Design and testing of SMA temperature-compensated cavity resonators

2003· article· en· W2058045153 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Resonator Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResonatorActuatorSMA*ConductorTemperature controlElectronic engineeringShape-memory alloyPerturbation (astronomy)Temperature measurementAcousticsMaterials scienceControl theory (sociology)EngineeringPhysicsComputer scienceOptoelectronicsMechanical engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a method for designing temperature-compensated cavity resonators using shape memory alloys (SMAs). This paper gives an expression for the temperature drift of resonant frequency, which is valid for any conductor-loaded cavity regardless of its shape. This formula, combined with a field perturbation model, is used to derive the resonant frequency of an SMA-compensated resonator subject to temperature fluctuation. Experimental results are given that confirm the feasibility of the proposed design approach. A design method is proposed for specifying SMA alloys to build the actuator. An expression is derived to accurately predict the performance of an actuator design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.460
Threshold uncertainty score0.806

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it