MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058045742 · doi:10.1109/i2mtc.2013.6555449

Design of a capacitive ECG sensor for unobtrusive heart rate measurements

2013· article· en· W2058045742 on OpenAlexaff
Amaya Arcelus, Mohammed Sardar, Alex Mihailidis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitive sensingComputer sciencePopulationElectrical engineeringReal-time computingSimulationEngineeringMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease among the aging population has prompted greater interest in the field of smart home monitoring and unobtrusive cardiac measurements. This paper introduces the design of a capacitive electrocardiogram (ECG) sensor that measures heart rate with no conscious effort from the user. The sensor consists of two active electrodes and an analog processing circuit that is low cost and customizable to the surfaces of common household objects. Prototype testing was performed in a home laboratory by embedding the sensor into a couch, walker, office and dining chairs. The sensor produced highly accurate heart rate measurements (<; 2.3% error) via either direct skin contact or through one and two layers of clothing. The sensor requires no gel dielectric and no grounding electrode, making it particularly suited to the “zero-effort” nature of an autonomous smart home environment. Motion artifacts caused by deviations in body contact with the electrodes were identified as the largest source of unreliability in continuous ECG measurements and will be a primary focus in the next phase of this project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207