MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058067601 · doi:10.1002/jcla.20098

St. John's wort does not interfere with therapeutic drug monitoring of 12 commonly monitored drugs using immunoassays

2006· article· en· W2058067601 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperforinHypericum perforatumPharmacologyCarbamazepineHypericinDrugDigoxinChemistryTherapeutic drug monitoringQuinidinePhenytoinTherapeutic indexImmunoassayMedicineInternal medicineEpilepsyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

St. John's wort, a popular herbal remedy for depression, is known to interact with many Western drugs because of the ability of its components to induce liver enzymes. Lower concentrations of various drugs due to increased clearance have been reported. Because immunoassays are commonly used in clinical laboratories for therapeutic drug monitoring, we studied the potential interference of St. John's wort with commonly monitored therapeutic drugs. Drug-free serum pools were supplemented with St. John's wort to achieve in vitro St. John's wort concentrations mimicking in vivo concentrations after both recommended use and overdose. Concentrations of digoxin, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), phenytoin, carbamazepine, theophylline, valproic acid, quinidine, phenobarbital, procainamide, and N-acetyl procainamide were measured in serum. Pooled serum specimens from patients who were taking a particular drug were also supplemented in vitro with concentrations of St. John's wort to investigate whether observed concentrations changed after supplementation with St. John's wort. The effect of St. John's wort on cyclosporine and tacrolimus (FK 506) was studied in whole blood. We found no significant interference from St. John's wort with any assay studied. Moreover, when drug-free serum was supplemented with very high concentrations of hypericin (2 microg/mL) and hyperforin (2 microg/mL) pure standard, we observed no apparent drug level with any immunoassay. The presence of both hypericin and hyperforin was also confirmed by thin layer chromatography (TLC) in both preparations of St. John's wort. We conclude that immunoassays may be used to measure levels of therapeutic drugs in patients who self-medicate with St. John's wort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it