MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058099721 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2012.2215606

Constant Offset Autonomous Spectrum Balancing Using Multiple Reference Lines for VDSL

2012· article· en· W2058099721 on OpenAlexaff
S. Huberman, Christopher Leung, Tho Le‐Ngoc

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Communications and Noise
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOffset (computer science)Computer scienceLagrange multiplierConstant (computer programming)Digital subscriber lineReal-time computingIterative methodMultiplier (economics)Line (geometry)AlgorithmMathematical optimizationTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of Lagrange multiplier offsets improves the iterative water-filling algorithm for digital subscriber line systems. We present a technique for generating constant offsets using a virtual network of reference lines. We provide simulation results that show that the achievable performance is very close to that of existing state-of-the-art algorithms, while requiring significantly fewer time-consuming interference measurements and reducing the amount of message passing required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.849

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Signal ProcessingSame topicPower Line Communications and NoiseFrench-language works237,207