MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058110992 · doi:10.1080/01472520601163854

Make It Maverick: Rethinking the “Make It Macho” Strategy for Men in Ballet

2007· article· en· W2058110992 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDance Chronicle · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDiversity and Impact of Dance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalletArt historyDanceRomanceSpectacleArtNationalismHuman sexualityMasculinitySociologyGender studiesPoliticsLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1. Jules Janin, quoted in John V. Chapman, “Jules Janin: Romantic Critic,” in Rethinking the Sylph: New Perspectives on the Romantic Ballet, ed. Lynn Garafola (Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England, 1997), p. 204. 2. See historical accounts such as Ted Shawn, with Gray Poole, One Thousand and One Night Stands (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1979), Jane Sherman and Barton Mumaw, Barton Mumaw, Dancer: From Denishawn to Jacob's Pillow and Beyond (Hanover, N.H.: Wesleyan University Press, 1986), and Walter Terry, Ted Shawn Father of American Dance (New York: Dial Press, 1976). For a contemporary consideration of the issues surrounding gender and nationalism in relation to Shawn, see especially the essays of Julia L. Foulkes and Susan Leigh Foster in Jane Desmond, ed., Dancing Desires: Choreographing Sexualities On and Off the Stage (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2001), pp. 113–46 and 147–207. 3. Shawn, with Poole, One Thousand and One Night Stands, p. 11. 4. Ramsay Burt, The Male Dancer: Bodies, Spectacle, Sexualities (London & New York: Routledge, 1995), p. 10. 5. Julia L. Foulkes, “Dance is for American Men: Ted Shawn and the Intersection of Gender, Sexuality, and Nationalism in the 1930s,” in Dancing Desires, p. 113. 6. Ibid., p. 130. 7. Ibid., pp. 129–30. 8. Some examples of ballet stereotyping that relate to masculinity were detailed in my book, Nutcracker Nation (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003), pp. 159–62. Others will appear in the introduction as well as in the essays of Dance and Masculinity, ed. Jennifer Fisher and Anthony Shay (in progress). 9. Catherine Milner, “More boys than girls join the Royal Ballet,” News.telegraph.co.uk, April 24, 2002. Accessed Nov. 15, 2005. 10. Ralph Backlund, “From a garage on West 152d Street, a ballet company soars to Moscow,” Smithsonian Magazine, July 1988, pp. 28–40. 11. Peggy Phelan, Unmarked: The Politics of Performance (New York: Routledge, 1993). 12. Essays by Burt, who adds to the analysis in his book, The Male Dancer, and by Risner, who investigates the ballet training experiences of boys and young men, will appear in an upcoming volume on dance and masculinity (see above, note 8). 13. John Gruen, Erik Bruhn: Danseur Noble (New York: Viking, 1979), pp. 97, 115, 124. 14. Diane Solway, Nureyev: His Life (New York: William Morrow, 1998). 15. Horst Koegler, “Dancing in the Closet: The Coming Out of Ballet,” Dance Chronicle, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1995, p. 231. 16. Graham Jackson, Dance as Dance: Selected Reviews and Essays (Scarborough, Canada: Catalyst, 1978), pp. 38–43. 17. Burt, The Male Dancer, p. 29. 18. John Jordan examines evidence to the contrary by noting negative associations associated with dance in the eighteenth century in an essay that will appear in an upcoming volume on dance and masculinity (see above, note 8). 19. Burt, The Male Dancer, pp. 10, 28. 20. See J. Bailey and M. Oberschneider, “Sexual orientation and professional dance,” Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 26 (1997), pp. 433–444, and L. Hamilton, Advice for Dancers: Emotional Counsel and Practical Strategies. (New York: Jossey-Bass, 1998). I thank Doug Risner for these citations. 21. Michael Kimmel, Manhood in America: A Cultural History (New York: The Free Press, 1996), pp. 219–20, 290. 22. Brenda Dixon-Gottschild, The Black Dancing Body: A Geography from Coon to Cool (New York: Palgrave/Macmillan, 2003), p. 40. 23. See Kimmel, Manhood in America, pp. 333–5; Mosse, The Image of Man, p. 194; Burt, The Male Dancer, pp. 9, 30, 196.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it