MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058126024 · doi:10.1002/tt.3020080204

Preparation and evaluation of vegetable oil derived biodiesel esters as lubricity additives

2001· article· en· W2058126024 on OpenAlexafffund
Xutao Lang, Ajay K. Dalai, Martin J. T. Reaney, P. B. Hertz

Bibliographic record

VenueTribotest · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiodiesel Production and Applications
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaSaskatchewan Canola Development CommissionMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsLubricityBiodieselCanolaDiesel fuelOrganic chemistryAlkylMaterials scienceVegetable oilChemistryFood scienceCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Various vegetable‐oil derived esters using methyl, ethyl, butyl, and 2‐propyl alcohols were prepared and tested as diesel fuel lubricity additives in a roller‐on‐cylinder lubricity evaluator. At1% additive treat rate, the canola methyl and 2‐propyl esters, the best‐performing esters, increased the lubricity number of a reference fuel by 60%. Statistical analyses indicated strong effects of fatty acids and alcohols on the wear, friction, and lubricity number of the fuel. While no single fatty acid was identifiably responsible for the wear reduction, certain non‐linoleic compounds correlated with the wear data in a semi‐log relationship. The low‐temperature behaviour of the biodiesel was studied using differential scanning calorimetry. The major transitional peak temperature of the biodiesel esters changed with the melting points of their primary fatty acids, and decreased with the lengthening and branching of the tail alkyl groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTribotestSame topicBiodiesel Production and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207