MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058165990 · doi:10.1145/503334.503337

On filter effects in web caching hierarchies

2002· article· en· W2058165990 on OpenAlexaff
Carey Williamson

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Internet Technology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersDivision of Chemistry
KeywordsComputer scienceCacheCache invalidationCache algorithmsCache pollutionSmart CacheZipf's lawCPU cacheProxy (statistics)WorkloadExploitCache coloringPage cacheHierarchyParallel computingComputer networkDistributed computingOperating systemComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article studies the "filter effects" that occur in Web proxy caching hierarchies due to the presence of multiple levels of caches. That is, the presence of one level of cache changes the structural characteristics of the workload presented to the next level of cache, since only the requests that miss in one cache are forwarded to the next cache.Trace-driven simulations, with empirical and synthetic traces, are used to demonstrate the presence and magnitude of the filter effects in a multilevel Web proxy caching hierarchy. Experiments focus on the effects of cache size, cache replacement policy, Zipf slope, and the depth of the Web proxy caching hierarchy.Finally, the article considers novel cache management techniques that can better exploit the changing workload characteristics across a multilevel Web proxy caching hierarchy. Trace-driven simulations are used to evaluate the performance of these approaches. The simulation results demonstrate that size-based partitioning and heterogeneous cache replacement policies each offer improvements in overall caching performance. The sensitivity of the results to the degree of workload overlap among child-level proxy caches is also studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations90
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on Internet TechnologySame topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207