Conformité des bilans comparatifs des médicaments à l’admission transmis au département de pharmacie par télécopieur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
e bilan comparatif des medicaments (BCM) est un processusstructure au cours duquel les professionnels de la sante travaillent en partenariat avec les patients, les familles et lessoignants pour assurer la transmission d’une information exacteet complete sur les medicaments aux points de transition dessoins du patient (c.-a-d. admission, transfert et conge). Le processus englobe la production d’une liste complete de tous lesmedicaments que le patient prenait avant l’admission, c’est-a-dire le meilleur schema therapeutique possible. Cette liste estetablie grâce a diverses sources et comprend des renseignementssur les medicaments d’ordonnance, les medicaments en ventelibre, les vitamines et supplements, ainsi que le nom du medica-ment, la dose, la frequence et la voie d’administration. Touteanomalie relevee entre ce qui est prescrit au patient et ce qu'ilprend en realite sera signalee au fournisseur de soins pour etrecorrigee.L’etablissement d’un plan ecrit pour instaurer le BCMpartout dans l’organisme de soins est un test de conformiteetabli dans l’intitule de la Pratique organisationnelle requise parAgrement Canada
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.043 | 0.174 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".