MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058194213 · doi:10.1177/104990910402100314

Reduction of edema of lower extremities by subcutaneous, controlled drainage: Eight cases

2004· article· en· W2058194213 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphatic System and Diseases
Canadian institutionsRegina Qu'Appelle Health Region
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEdemaSurgeryPalliative treatmentReduction (mathematics)PathophysiologyPalliative careAnesthesiaInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the pathophysiology and modern treatment of edema. Dissatisfied with the treatment available, the authors report on the use of a closed, controlled drainage procedure in eight patients with severe edema of the lower limbs. It is important to note that this technique is used as a palliative procedure. Seven out of the eight patients considered the procedure to have been worthwhile, experienced improvement, and died comfortably. Apart from actual pain and consequent insomnia, the discomfort and misery produced by the constant leaden drag of the paralyzed, inflexible, and bolster-like limbs are important factors in the sum total of misery produced by the disease. 1 W. Sampson Handley, 1908 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it