Multivariate refinable Hermite interpolant
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We introduce a general definition of refinable Hermite interpolants and investigate their general properties. We also study a notion of symmetry of these refinable interpolants. Results and ideas from the extensive theory of general refinement equations are applied to obtain results on refinable Hermite interpolants. The theory developed here is constructive and yields an easy-to-use construction method for multivariate refinable Hermite interpolants. Using this method, several new refinable Hermite interpolants with respect to different dilation matrices and symmetry groups are constructed and analyzed. Some of the Hermite interpolants constructed here are related to well-known spline interpolation schemes developed in the computer-aided geometric design community (e.g., the Powell-Sabin scheme). We make some of these connections precise. A spline connection allows us to determine critical Hölder regularity in a trivial way (as opposed to the case of general refinable functions, whose critical Hölder regularity exponents are often difficult to compute). While it is often mentioned in published articles that “refinable functions are important for subdivision surfaces in CAGD applications", it is rather unclear whether an arbitrary refinable function vector can be meaningfully applied to build free-form subdivision surfaces. The bivariate symmetric refinable Hermite interpolants constructed in this article, along with algorithmic developments elsewhere, give an application of vector refinability to subdivision surfaces. We briefly discuss several potential advantages offered by such Hermite subdivision surfaces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it