MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058221353 · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2013.209

Aneurysmal Remodeling in the Circle of Willis after Carotid Occlusion in an Experimental Model

2013· article· en· W2058221353 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Vincent M. Tutino, Max Mandelbaum, Hoon Choi, Liza Pope, Adnan H. Siddiqui, John Kolega, Hui Meng

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeBC Cancer AgencyU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsCircle of WillisOcclusionInternal medicineCardiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carotid occlusions are associated with de novo intracranial aneurysm formation in clinical case reports, but this phenomenon is not widely studied. We performed bilateral carotid ligation (n=9) in rabbits to simulate carotid occlusion, and sham surgery (n=3) for control. Upon euthanasia (n=3 at 5 days, n=6 at 6 months post ligation, and n=3 at 5 days after sham operation), vascular corrosion casts of the circle of Willis (CoW) were created. Using scanning electron microscopy, we quantified gross morphologic, macroscopic, and microscopic changes on the endocasts and compared findings with histologic data. At 5 days, CoW arteries of ligated animals increased caliber. The posterior communicating artery (PCom) increased length and tortuosity, and the ophthalmic artery (OA) origin presented preaneurysmal bulges. At 6 months, calibers were unchanged from 5 days, PComs further increased tortuosity while presenting segmental dilations, and the OA origin and basilar terminus presented preaneurysmal bulges. This exploratory study provides evidence that flow increase after carotid occlusion produces both compensatory arterial augmentation and pathologic remodeling such as tortuosity and saccular/fusiform aneurysm. Our findings may have considerable clinical implications, as these lesser-known consequences should be considered when managing patients with carotid artery disease or choosing carotid ligation as a therapeutic option.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & MetabolismSame topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesFrench-language works237,207