MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058230766 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2012.6334823

Energy storage and power systems

2012· article· en· W2058230766 on OpenAlex
Nupur Bhatnagar, Bala Venkatesh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy storageRenewable energyIntermittent energy sourceComputer scienceElectric power systemPumped-storage hydroelectricityGrid energy storageGridReliability engineeringComputer data storageElectrical engineeringDistributed generationPower (physics)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrical energy storage applications for power systems are surveyed and presented. Energy storage for electrical energy has been the focus of attention due to improved technology, increased use of intermittent renewable sources, constrained transmission and distribution infrastructure and improved market rules. Though many applications exist, a detailed cost benefit analysis is required before large scale integration of energy storage devices in the power grid is possible. Many technical and non-technical challenges remain. Due to multiple benefits and costs associated with storage systems, detailed optimization studies are required to understand the electrical and financial impact of connecting energy storage to the grid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.152
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207